We can improve your training in less than 5 minutes. TAKE OUR QUIZ

Search
Close this search box.
Article

“I failed an audit – now what?” How to Get Compliant Through Training and Top LMS Features

Chris [1], a seasoned Director of Compliance, never imagined he’d face a day when his coffee would turn bitter with news of a failed compliance audit. “It was like being punched in the gut,” Chris recalls, his voice reflecting the shock and urgency of that moment. As someone responsible for ensuring his company adhered to stringent industry standards, the failure was not just a professional setback—it hinted at deeper cracks in the training infrastructure he had so meticulously crafted.

This stark revelation propelled Chris into immediate action. “We had to pivot quickly, not just to address the gaps but to fundamentally rethink our approach to compliance training,” he explains. The journey that followed wasn’t just about meeting compliance standards again but transforming the entire landscape of how training was perceived and implemented within his company.

Chris isn’t the only one.

60% of business owners say they struggle with keeping up with compliance and regulations
(Babson College).”

Join us as we delve into Chris’s story, a compelling tale of setbacks, insights, and transformative solutions through the strategic use of a Learning Management System (LMS). From the depths of compliance failure to setting new benchmarks in training effectiveness, Chris’s narrative is not just instructive but a testament to the resilience and adaptability that modern corporate environments demand.

The Impact of Failing an Audit

“In 2022, approximately 40% of audits reviewed contained deficiencies. This was a 6 percentage point increase from 2021, when the error rate was 34%.”

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) also found that:

  • There was an increase in failures to perform basic audit steps
  • Some firms lack a quality control system
  • Some firms with inspection procedures aren’t performing them
  • Audit opinions were signed without completing the required audit work

When a compliance audit goes south, the immediate repercussions ripple across multiple facets of an organization. For our composite character Chris, and indeed for many compliance directors, the initial fallout is a mix of shock, urgency, and a pressing need to analyze what went wrong.

  • Financial and Legal Consequences:
    The most immediate and palpable impact of failing an audit is often financial. Companies may face hefty fines and penalties, which can strain budgets and divert funds from other critical operations. For example, in the tech industry where regulations on data privacy and security are stringent, non-compliance can result in fines that reach millions of dollars, depending on the severity and nature of the violation. Beyond fines, there’s also the potential for legal repercussions, including lawsuits from stakeholders or interventions by regulatory bodies that can further complicate the business landscape.

Organizations with a high level of noncompliance with regulations showed an average cost of USD 5.05 million. This is a 12.6% increase compared to the average cost of a data breach, or USD 560,000.”
IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach Report 2023

  • Reputational Damage:
    Chris understands that the stain on a company’s reputation might be even more detrimental than immediate financial penalties. “In our industry, trust is everything. If our partners or customers start doubting our compliance standards, regaining that trust is an uphill battle,” he remarks. The damage to a company’s brand can lead to lost business opportunities, a decrease in customer loyalty, and challenges in establishing new partnerships.
  • Operational Disruptions:
    Failing an audit often necessitates a rapid overhaul of existing processes, which can disrupt day-to-day operations. Employees might need to undergo additional training, systems may need updates, and certain operations could be halted to implement necessary compliance measures. Chris notes, “The operational reboot required not just time and resources, but also a shift in our organizational mindset towards compliance.”
  • Employee Morale and Turnover:
    The indirect impact on employee morale cannot be understated. Discovering that their workplace has failed to meet industry standards can demoralize employees, leading to concerns about job security and the company’s future. This can increase turnover rates, particularly if employees feel the company isn’t committed to high standards or their personal development.
  • Long-Term Strategic Setbacks:
    Finally, a failed audit can force a company to reevaluate its long-term strategies. For Chris, this meant taking a hard look at how compliance was integrated into the overall business strategy. “It was a wake-up call that compliance needed to be a cornerstone of our operational strategy, not just a checkbox on a list,” he explains.

Through this exploration, Chris and his team began to see the failed audit not just as a setback, but as a pivotal moment for transformation. The next steps involved understanding the specific compliance failures and leveraging the right tools—particularly a robust LMS—to ensure such a failure would not happen again. This realization marked the beginning of a journey towards not just recovery, but improvement and innovation in their training processes.

“Now what?”

The news of the audit failure hit Chris like a tidal wave. “It was an emotional jolt, knowing that despite our best efforts, we had fallen short,” he admits. The initial feelings of shock and disappointment quickly gave way to a proactive urgency. Chris knew that dwelling on the failure would not remedy the situation; instead, he channeled his emotions into a drive for finding solutions.

Step 1: Mobilize team morale

Recognizing the potential for plummeting morale within his team, Chris acted swiftly to mitigate negative impacts. “My first step was to gather the team and address the issue head-on,” he explains. In this meeting, he emphasized that while the audit results were severe, the path forward would be a collective effort, turning the setback into a learning opportunity for everyone involved. By fostering an open environment where team members could voice concerns and contribute ideas, Chris helped prevent the onset of a defeatist attitude and encouraged a unified approach to tackling compliance issues.

Step 2: Analyze the audit findings

With the emotional groundwork laid, Chris and his team delved into the specifics of the audit report. They conducted a detailed analysis to pinpoint exactly where their processes had deviated from compliance standards. “We dissected every part of the audit to understand not just what went wrong, but why,” Chris states. This phase was crucial for developing a clear, actionable plan to address each compliance gap. The analysis identified training as key deficiency: employees did not understand compliance requirements or know how to implement them.

Chris dove deeper into the training deficiencies:

  • He identified gaps in existing training that had contributed to the audit failure. Chris conducted a thorough assessment of all training materials and methods. “We needed to pinpoint the disconnects between what was taught and what the audit expected from us,” Chris explains. This process involved reviewing course content, testing methodologies, and feedback mechanisms to ensure they were not only up to date but also effective in imparting critical compliance knowledge.
  • To ensure the accuracy and relevance of the training content, Chris collaborated with external and internal subject matter experts. These experts were instrumental in aligning the training materials with the latest industry standards and regulatory requirements. “Bringing in voices with current field experience transformed our theoretical knowledge into practical, actionable skills,” Chris highlights.

Step 3: Develop a compliance roadmap

The insights gained from the audit analysis informed the creation of a comprehensive compliance roadmap. This plan included immediate corrective actions, such as revising training modules and updating internal policies, as well as long-term strategies to prevent future failures. Chris knew the importance of this roadmap being adaptable, allowing for adjustments as regulatory landscapes evolved and new compliance challenges arose. He took several critical actions regarding:

  • Chris verified the importance of online training as the most efficient way to reach all employees with consistent information regarding compliance.
  • With insights from the SMEs, Chris led a comprehensive overhaul of the training modules. This revamp was not just about updating facts but also about improving engagement and retention. He introduced interactive elements such as simulations and real-world scenarios that mirrored the challenges employees might face in their roles. “Making training relatable and engaging ensures that the knowledge sticks,” he notes.
  • He leveraged LMS features for enhanced delivery of this training. The power of their LMS was fully harnessed to deliver this newly improved content effectively. Chris utilized advanced features of the LMS to create personalized learning paths for different roles within the company, acknowledging that not all employees needed the same level and type of training. Automated reminders, assessments, and feedback loops were set up to maintain engagement and measure progress in real time.
  • Equally important, he leveraged tracking features in the LMS to ensure that managers were aware if anyone on their team was not up to date on their training.

During this phase, Chris also thought about how to incorporate continuous learning and adaptation within the organization, where training was not a one-time event but an ongoing process. The LMS was configured to provide regular updates and refreshers based on changes in compliance laws and industry practices. “Adaptability is crucial in compliance training. Regulations evolve, and so must our approach to training,” Chris asserts.

Step 4: Communicate with stakeholders

Chris also took on the delicate task of communicating the audit results and remediation plans to external stakeholders, including regulators, partners, and customers. “Transparency was key in rebuilding trust,” he notes. By openly sharing their challenges and corrective strategies, Chris not only mitigated potential reputational damage but also reinforced the company’s commitment to high compliance standards.

Through these strategic training enhancements, Chris not only addressed the immediate compliance issues but also laid the groundwork for a resilient, knowledgeable workforce capable of navigating the complexities of their industry. This proactive approach to training ensured that the organization was not only prepared for re-audit but also better equipped to handle future challenges.


Leveraging LMS features to ensure compliance

After overhauling the training content, Chris’s next step was to maximize the capabilities of their LMS to ensure robust compliance and efficient training management, using the top features his training system allowed, listed below. If you don’t have a centralized training platform and you’ve failed a compliance audit, now’s the time to get one! Try a free LMS trial or talk with a training expert for free.

  • Chris utilized the LMS to set up automated compliance training paths tailored to various roles within the company. These paths were designed to guide employees through their required learning activities in a structured manner, ensuring no critical compliance training was overlooked. “Automation was key to ensuring everyone received the right training at the right time without manual intervention,” Chris explains. The LMS allowed for the configuration of prerequisite training and sequential learning, which helped maintain the integrity of the learning process.
  • One of the LMS’s most powerful features that Chris leveraged was its capability for real-time monitoring and reporting. This feature enabled Chris and his team to track completion rates, assess understanding through quizzes and tests, and monitor overall engagement levels. “With real-time data, we could quickly identify areas where employees might be struggling and intervene before it became a compliance risk,” he notes. This immediate access to data not only helped in maintaining records for audit purposes but also ensured that the training was having the desired impact.
  • To boost engagement and retention, Chris capitalized on the LMS’s interactive features such as gamification and discussion forums. Leaderboards, badges, and certificates were introduced to motivate employees by recognizing their learning achievements. Additionally, forums facilitated peer-to-peer interactions and discussions, enriching the learning experience. “Interactive elements not only make learning more enjoyable but also more impactful. Engaged learners retain information better and are more likely to apply what they’ve learned,” Chris remarks.
  • Recognizing the diverse schedules and responsibilities of their workforce, Chris ensured that the LMS was optimized for mobile use. This flexibility allowed employees to access training materials anytime and anywhere, accommodating their varying work environments and enhancing learning convenience. “Mobile access was crucial in fostering a learning culture that fit naturally into our employees’ lives, rather than disrupting them,” he points out.
  • Finally, Chris set the LMS to receive regular updates on compliance standards and regulatory changes. This dynamic updating capability meant that the training content remained current with minimal manual adjustments. “The scalability and adaptability of our LMS meant that as our company grows and as standards evolve, our training grows and evolves too,” he adds.

By strategically leveraging these LMS features, Chris transformed the compliance training from a static, check-the-box activity into a dynamic, engaging, and comprehensive learning experience. This not only prepared the company for a successful re-audit but also built a robust foundation for ongoing compliance and continuous improvement in their training processes.

The Role of Continuous Improvement and Feedback

Once the immediate compliance issues were addressed and the LMS features fully leveraged, Chris shifted focus towards cultivating an environment of continuous improvement within his organization. This final step in the compliance training overhaul was critical to sustaining the changes and ensuring long-term success.

  • Chris reinforced a culture of continuous learning. He understood that compliance isn’t a one-time achievement but a continuous endeavor. To embed this philosophy deeply within the company culture, he initiated regular training sessions, not just as refreshers but as opportunities to introduce new compliance-related developments and technologies. “We needed to move beyond the idea of compliance as a hurdle and view it as an integral part of our daily operations,” Chris explains. This approach encouraged employees to stay curious, informed, and proactive about compliance.
  • Critical to the continuous improvement process was the integration of robust learner feedback mechanisms within the LMS. Chris set up structured avenues for employees to provide feedback on their training experiences, from the user-friendliness of the LMS interface to the relevance and clarity of the training content. “Gathering and acting on feedback is essential, as it helps us refine our approaches and ensure the training remains effective and engaging,” he notes. This feedback was collected through automated post-course surveys, direct feedback tools embedded within the LMS, and open forums for discussion.
  • Utilizing the comprehensive analytics capabilities of the LMS, Chris continually analyzed training outcomes to identify trends and areas needing improvement. This data not only informed immediate adjustments but also helped tailor the training to meet diverse learner needs more effectively. “By personalizing the learning paths based on data insights, we could significantly enhance learner engagement and compliance adherence,” Chris remarks. Such personalization included adjusting the difficulty levels of quizzes based on employee performance or providing additional resources where gaps were evident.
  • Iterative content updates were also important.The training content was not static. Chris ensured that it was reviewed and updated regularly in response to the latest regulatory changes, technological advancements, and feedback from learners. This iterative process kept the content dynamic and relevant, thereby maintaining its efficacy. “Regular updates are vital for keeping the training aligned with both external regulations and internal advancements,” he asserts.
  • Finally, Chris made it a point to keep all stakeholders informed about the ongoing changes and improvements in the training program. This transparency not only reinforced the company’s commitment to compliance and excellence but also fostered a sense of collective responsibility and trust among employees, management, and external partners.

Through these strategies, Chris ensured that the compliance training program was not just rehabilitated in response to an audit failure but was also set on a path of continual growth and improvement. This proactive and reflective approach helped the company not only meet but exceed compliance standards, transforming potential vulnerabilities into strengths.

Conclusion: Turn Training Challenges Into Opportunities

Chris’s journey from a disheartening audit failure to achieving a robust and dynamic compliance environment is a testament to the power of proactive response and strategic use of technology. By embracing a comprehensive Learning Management System and fostering a culture of continuous learning, he not only navigated his company back to compliance but also set new benchmarks for training effectiveness.

Worried about your own audits and interested in upgrading or optimizing your training program? Try a free LMS trial or talk with a training expert for free.


[1] Please note that “Chris” is a stand-in name, and is a persona that reflects the experiences and challenges faced by numerous compliance directors we’ve engaged with at Knowledge Anywhere.